A little light reading for your Monday. Grab something strong to drink. (If it’s still morning, may I suggest coffee?)
Nobody Wins, but here’s the numbers…
According to the most recent estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 34 million people around the world had HIV in 2010. About one-half were women, and one-tenth were children younger than age 15.
Diabetes? 371 million. Almost 10 times more than HIV/AIDS. According to the International Diabetes Foundation statistics, this number will explode to 552 million in less than 20 years.
Cause of Death
An estimated 15,529 people with an AIDS diagnosis died in 2010 in the United States.
An estimated 40, 230 people died from breast cancer in 2010 in the United States.
Diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States.
69,071 people died in 2010 from diabetes.
This doesn’t take into account diabetes as a secondary factor for the cause of death. (You have a heart attack caused by heart disease caused by diabetes…. You have a stroke caused by high blood pressure caused by diabetes…Count some of those too and the death toll rises.) AIDS doesn’t even hit the top 15 in the mortality list.
Who Gets The Research Money from the NIH?
Well, here’s another tidbit that I’d like you to chew on for a while…
For every death due to AIDS/HIV, the NIH budgets $329,576 for research.
For every death due to breast cancer, the NIH budgets $17, 308 for research.
For every death due to diabetes, the NIH budgets $16,010 for research.
(No, I didn’t leave zeros off the last two.)
I got these numbers from the Fair Foundation (hat tip to Scott Strumello, who pointed me to not just this amazing website but is a great source for all things businesslike in the diabetes world.)
Raising Funds
According to an exposé by Marie Claire in 2011, an estimated $6 billion is raised every year for breast cancer. HIV/AIDS raises more than that ($16.8 billion, according to AVERT.).
A 2010 article in Diabetes Health shows that the money raised for diabetes is…not anywhere near $16.8 or $6 billion dollars per year.
What does this all mean?
Diabetes is the Rodney Dangerfield of diseases. It gets almost no respect.
We’ve got a rising tide of diabetes diagnoses throughout the world (including a rise in Type 1 diabetes that has a lot of people alarmed), a small portion of the NIH funding going to diabetes research for the amount of individuals in the United States impacted by the disease, and we’re dying. (Yes. We are all dying. Every minute of every day. I’d just like to die of something else.)
Pancreases aren’t sexy. Boobs are. AIDS/HIV may not be sexy, but it has garnered the lion’s share of publicity and became the cause for many a famous person. (The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, anyone?)
I’ve lost extended family to breast cancer. I’ve lost childhood friends to AIDS.
I want those diseases cured. And…
I want diabetes to get the same type of support that these diseases do.
I want diabetes to stop being misinterpreted as a disease that doesn’t kill you like breast cancer and AIDS.
I want funding.
I want recognition.
I want the world to know that while we live well with this disease, we need to stop being the seventh leading cause of death in the U.S.
Do I want too much? No. Do I see a problem? Yes. And you know how the saying goes: “If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.”
So, I’m going to be a part of the solution. I refuse to be a number.
It should be said that the money spent on HIV/AIDS and cancer research is money well spent…but diabetes deserves equally attention. This is pathetic (not your post…the numbers).
I’m with you on that, Mike. I think there’s been a concerted effort to hyper focus on certain elements of HIV/AIDS and breast cancer that has pushed research efforts further than the scatter approach I see in diabetes research.
“Scatter approach” is the perfect description. 🙁
I think just like our A1c, these are numbers that many of us don’t want to think about sometimes. But we must. Like you, I’ve lost friends to AIDS and breast cancer, and I want additional funding and recognition for diabetes, and I want to be part of the solution. Actually, I think additional recognition will bring additional funding. So what do I do now? I always feel like I’m not doing enough.
I agree the numbers are unfair to others with debilitating diseases. I think contagion drives the dollars.
I think a big reasons for the disparity is that nobody really knows what to DO with diabetes. Do we attach external machines? Do we find new way to treat it? Do we encapsulate it? Vaccinate it? Immunosuppress it? Transplant it? Give up hope because of the alleged “pharma conspiracy”? We don’t even have a clear-cut path to life-without-diabetes; it’s simply not as easy as “get rid of the bad stuff”. It’s confusing and complex, and when people aren’t quite sure what to do or what to fund, they tend to turn their support elsewhere. (If you’re looking for me to answer any of these questions or define a roadmap, I’m sorry you won’t find them here in this comment).
Thank you, Christel.
Reblogged this on Eden's Effort and commented:
hmmm… some extra numbers to chew on.. scary reality – there will not BE a cure unless people understand this disease… even more fuel for me to continue spreading awareness… please help me